What Would a Good Humanist do?
o Freedom of Speech on social media [Donald Trump; Elon Musk & Twitter]
o Is Inheritance Morally Acceptable? — should family or state pay for our care in old age?
o Facial Recognition Technology — can locate criminals & lost children but is threat to privacy / rights
Democracy & Social Cohesion
o Threats to Democracy
o What Threat Misinformation?
Religion & Rights
o Are Muslim Women Discriminated Against?
o Blasphemy — Should humanists campaign on this in the UK (i.e. in Northern Ireland)?
o Should Humanists be More Intolerant of Intolerant Clerics/Religions? If so, how might we express this?
The Climate Crisis
o ‘Another World is Possible’ — Discuss Geoff Mulgan’s thesis in his new book subtitled: ‘how to reignite social and political imagination’
o Climate Justice — What might it mean in practice following COP27
Direct Action
o Deep Adaptation [the work of Jem Bendell & Extinction Rebellion]
o Anti-Social Behaviour — is blocking roads/defacing famous paintings ever acceptable / justified?
2. It will make us realise that people are not islands
3. It may encourage a proper sort of localism
4. It may encourage altruism
5. It may remind us of some neglected constituencies
6. It may make future epidemics less likely
7. It might make us more realistic about medicine
8. Wildlife may benefit

Looking around our world today, I see an appalling mess created by humanity. The old threats of spreading war & pandemics have been joined by the new ones of climate change & unregulated tech expansion. Unless there is change, life for all beings on earth is going to get progressively worse.
I’m glad no-one’s yet asked me “What do humanists think about all this?” because I have no answer. As humanists, we pride ourselves on applying our rationality to difficult subjects, yet I’ve seen little evidence of this happening in relation to the crises humankind is facing. Of course, humanists are involved in vital work fighting the effects of religious bigotry, creating spaces for people persecuted by religion & promoting free thought & expression. But all these values are under threat as long as global issues are left unsolved. And how many people will be interested in a movement with such a parochial & backward-looking agenda?
Humanists internationally welcome the waning influence of religion across the world, but this change has left a gap. Few non-religious organisations have an overall world view which provides a basis for forming one’s own opinions. So do we simply leave this to Meta, Tik-Tok & Telegraph to fill? I believe humanism has not only a role but a duty to contribute to the search for a rational, ethical way through & beyond the global issues which face us.
But how are we to play our part?
Firstly, like all organisations & institutions, we need to think about & discuss our own response, producing policies within our organisations & ensuring our own affairs are in order. Regularly updated, these should be widely available, via our websites, on social media & other outlets & as a subject for discussion.
Secondly, we can make our concern about these enormous challenges clear, widening our focus from the important but limited issues which are the traditional domain of humanism to include the new ones. Any organisation with a commitment to free speech must be concerned about the serious effect of misinformation spread via social media, on us as individuals & on all societies. The use of AI “deep fakes” takes the danger even further - surely the potential loss of our ability to distinguish truth from lies must be something on which humanists should be prepared to make a stand? The escalating climate crisis is already affecting people’s livelihoods& lives & is going to get worse, increasing inequality, the pressure on the basics of life & producing further triggers for conflict. Humanism needs a clear analysis of the situation. These matters should be an integral part of the concerns we voice, spreading the facts, suggesting ways to look at them & discussing ways forward. We need to broaden our concept of relevant news & publicise our thoughts on events as they unfold - not taking a position, but sharing our thoughts, allowing others to reach their own conclusions.
Finally, it is not our role to become campaigners & that's not what I am advocating. There are NGOs in all these areas of concern who have decades of experience & skills so why would we? But there are also forums where interested parties come together to debate & plan. I would like to see Humanism, on local, national & international levels, attending these sessions to contribute to the debate from a humanist perspective, as religious bodies have always brought theirs. And many humanists are involved in these campaigning organisations, which could benefit both parties by spreading the ideas of humanism to an audience of like-minded people.
The world has never been in such danger from so many directions. The decline of religion has left a vacuum. Can humanists continue to ignore the necessity & the opportunity? My vision for the future is Humanism as the positive secular alternative, playing a major role in bringing a fresh perspective to this new, problematic world we’re facing & spreading our approach wherever we can.